Skip to main content

Jay Has A Legal Opinion

Dear Political Campaigns --

Since most of you are lawyers, or have lawyers (or SHOULD have lawyers), I didn't think this was going to be necessary, but apparently I was wrong, so let me just say this:

You are not permitted to use other people's songs and music without their permission unless they are way dead. Like a hundred years dead. Beethoven dead.

Yes, this means even if you really like the song, or even if it's totally your nickname (I'm looking at you Sarah "Barracuda" Palin). Because, you see, if they are still alive*, the people who wrote the songs and the people who sing the songs are supposed to get paid when you play them.

Also, in case you didn't realize this, musicians and song writers are artists, and a lot of the time artists get a little...pissy when you try to use their stuff to promote things they don't necessarily like. Like, for example:

1. trickle down economics (see, e.g., Bruce Springsteen's objections to Ronald Reagan's use of "Born in the USA),

2. or energy reform that involves drilling in the Alaskan wilderness (see, e.g., Jackson Browne's objection to John McCain's commercial featuring "Running on Empty"),

3. or economic policy that provides tax breaks only for the top 3% of taxpayers (see, e.g., John McCain again, for his illicit use of John Cougar/John Cougar Mellencamp/John Mellencamp's "Pink Houses"),

4. or yourself (see, e.g., Heart's recent objections to Sarah Palin's use of "Barracuda").

I know! They're so demanding, what with their "artistic integrity" and "ownership of intellectual property" and "rights of publicity", but since y'all are supposed to be setting an example, perhaps you could start by, you know, asking permission for use of the songs, instead of just ripping them off.

Thanks!
Jay

P.S. Funny how all of these examples are of Republicans, right? It's not because I don't like Republicans (although I don't. I mean politically. Personally, I have no problems with Republicans. Some of my best friends are Republicans. Wait...no, they aren't. But some of my friends are! Good ones! Very friendly acquaintances!**), but because I couldn't find any examples involving Democrats. Not because Democrats do a better job of clearing their music rights (although they may), but because, I suspect, most musicians are liberals. (Except Neil Young, of course, and some country artists.) So when Bill Clinton wants to use Fleetwood Mac, or example, Fleetwood Mac either says "sure, cool" right up front, or else they don't get their undies in a twist when Bill does it without permission.

P.P.S. Ironic Moment Alert: As I was driving this morning thinking about this post, what should come on NPR but a clip about John McCain's rally in Wisconsin yesterday, where they were playing the song "Who Says You Can't Go Home" by Bon Jovi. Yes, that would be the same Bon Jovi who is having a fund raising dinner in his house for Barack Obama.

*or within the applicable term of the copyright statutes, but I couldn't figure out a fun way to say that. sigh. Lawyers, man.

**in all seriousness, I do have really good friends that are Republicans. I don't pick my friends by political affiliation.

Comments

Katie Alender said…
It seems like a calculated risk. They probably figured the extent of the fine they'd have to pay and went ahead and played the song. In that case, much easier to apologize afterward than get permission beforehand.

On the other hand, if they broadcast it, the fines can be hella expensive so that seems... what's the word... the word that means... prohibitive.

(That's a glimpse directly at the inner workings of my brain, right there.)
Anonymous said…
I forget which comedian said that if this trend keeps up (liberal music artists denying anybody the rights to use their songs), pretty soon politicians will be limited to public domain songs, like "Jimmy Crack Corn."

I'm always amused that the campaigns think that somebody would be remotely interested in their ideas if they only played the right song. Then again, people ARE pretty stupid. "Hey, they're playing that song I like, maybe I should vote for these folks!"

Popular posts from this blog

Monday Miscellany

1. I've been watching old episodes of The West Wing on Bravo lately, and have come to the conclusion that I love the character of Sam Seaborn. He's smart, he's earnest, he's a good writer, and he's played by Rob Lowe. What's not to love?* 2. I just bought the cutest jacket at Ann Taylor Loft. I know you care, but it's not every day that one can find a white denim jacket with styling reminiscent of Michael Jackson and a tailored waist. I'm just saying. 3. NaNoWriMo proceeds apace. There is no way that I'm going to be able to keep writing at this pace after this month is over, but I'm on track to finish. It's an interesting project...in some ways the speed is freeing and in other ways it's extremely limited, as to make the word count I have no time to go back and revise. 4. Alien and Aliens are amazing movies. Alien 3 and Alien Resurrection ? Not so much. 5. This week's Glee characterization inconsistency watch: Rache...

Why Are The Characters Friends?

Lately, I've been reading a lot of books where the main character and her best friend don't get along. This is confusing to me. Why is the main character friends with someone she dislikes, or is afraid of, or actually hates? I get that it happens--I've seen Mean Girls . I've read Queen Bees and Wannabes . Heck, I'm old enough to have been the prime audience for Heathers . But in order for this fractured best friend relationship to be convincing, it has to be set up. In both Heathers and Mean Girls , there's a reason why the protagonist is friends with a bunch of b*tches--she chose to be. She knows that they're jerks. In fact, she can feel herself becoming a jerk right along with them. It's part of the character arc, the point of the story, that being friends with these girls is not who she really is. But the relationships I've been seeing lately don't make that kind of sense. The protagonist doesn't have a reason to be friends with...

Jay Takes A Stand

Moonrat, still at Editorial Ass, is making me think a lot lately. She did a recent post here about sexualized violence in print ads, and connected the dots to sexualized violence in books and other media, which got me thinking about how I treat girls and women in my books. To be clear--I'm a feminist. I believe in equal pay for equal work and reproductive choice, and the whole ball of wax. I'm not going to go into detail about all that here because, frankly, there are people out there whose blogs are dedicated to that kind of thing (like Jezebel *) and they do it way better than I ever could. But that's my political orientation, in case you care. So when I was writing The Book, it was very important to me that my female protagonist S did not fall into any of those "heroine needs saving by the hero" tropes that so many books for teenage girls do. Sure, there's something very "romantic" about the hero swooping in and rescuing the heroine, right? ...