Skip to main content

Monday Miscellany

1. I've been watching old episodes of The West Wing on Bravo lately, and have come to the conclusion that I love the character of Sam Seaborn. He's smart, he's earnest, he's a good writer, and he's played by Rob Lowe. What's not to love?*

2. I just bought the cutest jacket at Ann Taylor Loft. I know you care, but it's not every day that one can find a white denim jacket with styling reminiscent of Michael Jackson and a tailored waist. I'm just saying.

3. NaNoWriMo proceeds apace. There is no way that I'm going to be able to keep writing at this pace after this month is over, but I'm on track to finish. It's an interesting project...in some ways the speed is freeing and in other ways it's extremely limited, as to make the word count I have no time to go back and revise.

4. Alien and Aliens are amazing movies. Alien 3 and Alien Resurrection? Not so much.

5. This week's Glee characterization inconsistency watch: Rachel, who made "I'm sorry" cookies for Mr. Shue in an early episode, said last week that she couldn't do a bake sale because her family was "fully committed to takeout" but this week made Mr. Shue a casserole. sigh.

6. Nathan Bransford says here that ebooks will triumph because efficiency always wins in the end. I think he's confusing technology with efficiency. And I wonder what he means by "the end."

7. Editorial Anonymous has a post here talking about the why some really successful authors may seem to be edited less...rigorously than others. It's interesting to hear that some of my suppositions about why editing falls off as a series progresses are actually true.

~~~

* This explains why I lost interest in The West Wing in its later seasons--Sam left. Also, the show sort of lost its way and had some seriously crappy writing going on. But Sam leaving was also a big part of it.

Comments

Anonymous said…
What's not to love? First, it was The West Wing. Second . . . let's just leave it at that.
Anonymous said…
Awwww, that's so sweet. That's probably the nicest thing I've been called in many years. If you put AnonyMcCrabbyPants as an option in the "choose an identity" section, I will use it!

Popular posts from this blog

Jay Takes A Stand

Moonrat, still at Editorial Ass, is making me think a lot lately. She did a recent post here about sexualized violence in print ads, and connected the dots to sexualized violence in books and other media, which got me thinking about how I treat girls and women in my books. To be clear--I'm a feminist. I believe in equal pay for equal work and reproductive choice, and the whole ball of wax. I'm not going to go into detail about all that here because, frankly, there are people out there whose blogs are dedicated to that kind of thing (like Jezebel *) and they do it way better than I ever could. But that's my political orientation, in case you care. So when I was writing The Book, it was very important to me that my female protagonist S did not fall into any of those "heroine needs saving by the hero" tropes that so many books for teenage girls do. Sure, there's something very "romantic" about the hero swooping in and rescuing the heroine, right? ...

The waiting is the hardest part

As I mentioned, I entered the Fangs, Fur & Fey contest over on their blog (there's a link in the sidebar). And the results are supposed to be posted on Monday, which when all the hook writers would find out whether they should send in pages or not. Cool, cool. But, as it turns out, some of the judges are really on their game, and have been turning in entries earlier. Which have been being posted earlier. Which means that for the last two days I've been checking the website obsessively in the hope of seeing my magic number - 121 - up there. Which it has NOT been. 122 has gone up, but not 121. I'm trying to take this as a good sign. ::fingers crossed:: The contest itself has been real eye-opener. Good hooks, bad hooks, good hooks for books I would never read in a million years, bad hooks for books that I think I would love ... it's really cool. I also love the comments that the judges are making, which are usually right, but which also point out just how mu...