Skip to main content

On Persistence

Recently, Moonrat had a post on Editorial Ass about a conversation that she's had (and hear others have) about books. According to Moonrat, at some point in most projects, someone gets tired of the book and says "it is what it is," and sends it on to the next step, even if it's not quite 100%.

You know what, it's true.

I mean, I haven't seen it happen in the publishing industry--I don't work in the publishing industry--but I do write in my day job, and there's a point in drafting the contract or the brief where the team says "F*** it; print it and let's go."

And it's not because the lawyers on the team are lazy or untalented or don't know what they're doing. It's because they're tired. Because they've poured their time, their blood, sweat, and tears into the work, because they want to win. But there's only so much you can give before you have to throw up your hands and take a break. And if you're facing a deadline and can't take a break? Well, then, it is what it is. And the contract goes to the other side and you think you'll catch it in the next round of revisions.

So if it happens in the law, where people are already getting paid for their work, then of course it happens in the publishing industry, where most people are laboring for love (at least at first). It's hard to keep going back to a project over and over again with no end in sight, wondering when you're going to be good enough to go to the next step (which will just require more work).*

But Moonrat also has a good point about dealing with the inevitable fatigue:

The best professionals in any sector of the industry are the ones who fight it out a couple more rounds before throwing up their hands. Since you can't guarantee that anyone else who will be working on your book at any other stage will have the time, energy, and bandwidth to give it their all to the bitter end, you, the author, would do yourself a favor by not being the lazy one.


You may be tired. You may be fed up. You may be exhausted. But fight it out a couple more rounds, if you can.

~~~

* Some of the commenters on Moonrat's post are a little righteous about this fact. They say things like "I will never be the one who gives up on my work" and "I love everything about writing and would never be tired of working" (I'm paraphrasing). I hope that it's true for them, but it's never been true of anyone else I knew who worked in publishing.

Comments

Donna Gambale said…
I completely get what you're saying! You can always, always tweak and revise your book, and I know that authors still have the urge to fix things even after they're published! But you can't tweak forever, and eventually what you're doing will only make a miniscule difference in the quality of the book. That's when I hit the end.

I revise on multiple levels, even reading the book aloud, until it becomes procrastinating, then I give it one more go to satisfy the perfectionist within. And that's all! Fiction is also so subjective, you have to "give up" at some point, because it's theoretically never finished!

Popular posts from this blog

Monday Miscellany

1. I've been watching old episodes of The West Wing on Bravo lately, and have come to the conclusion that I love the character of Sam Seaborn. He's smart, he's earnest, he's a good writer, and he's played by Rob Lowe. What's not to love?* 2. I just bought the cutest jacket at Ann Taylor Loft. I know you care, but it's not every day that one can find a white denim jacket with styling reminiscent of Michael Jackson and a tailored waist. I'm just saying. 3. NaNoWriMo proceeds apace. There is no way that I'm going to be able to keep writing at this pace after this month is over, but I'm on track to finish. It's an interesting project...in some ways the speed is freeing and in other ways it's extremely limited, as to make the word count I have no time to go back and revise. 4. Alien and Aliens are amazing movies. Alien 3 and Alien Resurrection ? Not so much. 5. This week's Glee characterization inconsistency watch: Rache...

Why Are The Characters Friends?

Lately, I've been reading a lot of books where the main character and her best friend don't get along. This is confusing to me. Why is the main character friends with someone she dislikes, or is afraid of, or actually hates? I get that it happens--I've seen Mean Girls . I've read Queen Bees and Wannabes . Heck, I'm old enough to have been the prime audience for Heathers . But in order for this fractured best friend relationship to be convincing, it has to be set up. In both Heathers and Mean Girls , there's a reason why the protagonist is friends with a bunch of b*tches--she chose to be. She knows that they're jerks. In fact, she can feel herself becoming a jerk right along with them. It's part of the character arc, the point of the story, that being friends with these girls is not who she really is. But the relationships I've been seeing lately don't make that kind of sense. The protagonist doesn't have a reason to be friends with...

Jay Takes A Stand

Moonrat, still at Editorial Ass, is making me think a lot lately. She did a recent post here about sexualized violence in print ads, and connected the dots to sexualized violence in books and other media, which got me thinking about how I treat girls and women in my books. To be clear--I'm a feminist. I believe in equal pay for equal work and reproductive choice, and the whole ball of wax. I'm not going to go into detail about all that here because, frankly, there are people out there whose blogs are dedicated to that kind of thing (like Jezebel *) and they do it way better than I ever could. But that's my political orientation, in case you care. So when I was writing The Book, it was very important to me that my female protagonist S did not fall into any of those "heroine needs saving by the hero" tropes that so many books for teenage girls do. Sure, there's something very "romantic" about the hero swooping in and rescuing the heroine, right? ...