Skip to main content

On Nostalgia

Nostalgia - it's delicate, but potent. Teddy told me that in Greek, "nostalgia" literally means "the pain from an old wound." It's a twinge in your heart far more powerful than memory alone.

Don Draper "The Wheel" Mad Men


Like a lot of writers, I suspect, many of the things I write come from memory. Not memories, per se--but from memory, using bits and pieces of things I've seen and heard and lived to create whole new places that, I hope, are just as real.

And I've discovered, recently, that there are things I shouldn't do in order to preserve my memory. Like, for example, Facebook. Don't get me wrong--I'm on Facebook, and I've reconnected with people from my past and all that--but there are people who I don't look up, because they have become fantasies. And there are questions I don't ask of the people who I have reconnected with because I've already made up the answers. And when I go home, there are streets I don't drive down because they are the settings of stories. If I lived entirely in the real world, seeing things as they are now instead of as they were then (even if "then" was just two weeks ago) then I wouldn't be a writer. I wouldn't have anything to write about.

Mark Blankenship wrote a post about something like this, recently, when he talked about how Midnight Cowboy makes him sad. There are some things, in fact, that you can't go back to because to go back is to ruin it.* In his entry he gives a specific example of something that could only be ruined by looking back:

But here’s the thing: As long as I don’t see The Care Bears Movie again, the wonder I felt about it is still intact, and I don’t want to screw that up, you know? Why clutter the memory with an adult perspective that grasps what a crappy movie it is?

And that's the question, right? If you have something wonderful about your past or your childhood, why go back to it? Sometimes, of course, going back is inevitable -- I can't stop people from friending me on Facebook**-- but sometimes, particularly in the case of cultural artifacts, like Mark's Care Bears Movie, it's not, and we might be better served by sticking to memory, which leaves us with something to love, and gives us something to imagine.

~~~

* The clearest example of this I can think of in my own life is my experience of Garrison Keillor's A Prairie Home Companion. One evening in the late spring, I happened to catch an episode of PHC on NPR. In it, Keillor did a monologue about Lake Woebegone (as he usually does) and talked about the kids graduating from high school, standing in their gowns, the graduation ceremony, the parents in their driveways taking photos...and it was so...perfect, so amazing, that I have never listened to another episode of the show again. Ever. No kidding. I haven't even tried to find out which episode of the show I heard, because if it heard it again, I might notice a mistake, a flaw, and my perfect memory would be ruined.

** Nor do I really want to, unless you were a jerk to me, in which case, why would you even think to friend me? Are you high?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

On Mary Sue

I recently read a Very Popular Book in a Very Popular Series, which I was going to talk about here until I read the second book in the series and realized--OH NO--that the main character of the book is a total Mary Sue. sigh. For those of you who didn't spend time in the fanfic world, a Mary Sue is a character who everyone else loves. She's a stand-in for the author (fanfic is written mostly by women, which is why "Mary Sue," although there are some Gary Stus out there as well).She's beautiful (but not too beautiful), she's funny, she's self-deprecating, she's smart, and all the other characters will fall head over heels in love with her and think she's awesome. (An example, if I wrote Friday Night Lights fanfiction, Mary Sue would move to town and become Riggins' girlfriend, and Jason Street would have a crush on her, and Lyla Garrity would like her and even Tyra would must us some grudging respect, and their lives would all be better for k...

Why Are The Characters Friends?

Lately, I've been reading a lot of books where the main character and her best friend don't get along. This is confusing to me. Why is the main character friends with someone she dislikes, or is afraid of, or actually hates? I get that it happens--I've seen Mean Girls . I've read Queen Bees and Wannabes . Heck, I'm old enough to have been the prime audience for Heathers . But in order for this fractured best friend relationship to be convincing, it has to be set up. In both Heathers and Mean Girls , there's a reason why the protagonist is friends with a bunch of b*tches--she chose to be. She knows that they're jerks. In fact, she can feel herself becoming a jerk right along with them. It's part of the character arc, the point of the story, that being friends with these girls is not who she really is. But the relationships I've been seeing lately don't make that kind of sense. The protagonist doesn't have a reason to be friends with...

Meme!

That I stole from Sarah Miller : The instructions: Look at the list and (1) Bold those you have read. (2) Italicize those you intend to read. (3) Underline the books you LOVE. 1. Pride and Prejudice - Jane Austen 2. The Lord of the Rings - JRR Tolkien 3. Jane Eyre - Charlotte Bronte 4. Harry Potter series - JK Rowling (made it to book four, and bailed.) 5. To Kill a Mockingbird - Harper Lee 6. The Bible 7. Wuthering Heights - Emily Bronte 8. 1984 - George Orwell 9. His Dark Materials - Philip Pullman 10. Great Expectations - Charles Dickens 11. Little Women - Louisa M Alcott 12. Tess of the D'Urbervilles - Thomas Hardy 13. Catch 22 - Joseph Heller 14. Complete Works of Shakespeare (most of them, anyway. The comedies make my eyes gloss over, though). 15. Rebecca - Daphne Du Maurier 16. The Hobbit - JRR Tolkien 17. Birdsong - Sebastian Faulks 18. Catcher in the Rye - JD Salinger 19. The Time Traveller's Wife - Audrey Niffenegger 20. Middlemarch - George Eliot 21. ...