Skip to main content

On Nostalgia

Nostalgia - it's delicate, but potent. Teddy told me that in Greek, "nostalgia" literally means "the pain from an old wound." It's a twinge in your heart far more powerful than memory alone.

Don Draper "The Wheel" Mad Men


Like a lot of writers, I suspect, many of the things I write come from memory. Not memories, per se--but from memory, using bits and pieces of things I've seen and heard and lived to create whole new places that, I hope, are just as real.

And I've discovered, recently, that there are things I shouldn't do in order to preserve my memory. Like, for example, Facebook. Don't get me wrong--I'm on Facebook, and I've reconnected with people from my past and all that--but there are people who I don't look up, because they have become fantasies. And there are questions I don't ask of the people who I have reconnected with because I've already made up the answers. And when I go home, there are streets I don't drive down because they are the settings of stories. If I lived entirely in the real world, seeing things as they are now instead of as they were then (even if "then" was just two weeks ago) then I wouldn't be a writer. I wouldn't have anything to write about.

Mark Blankenship wrote a post about something like this, recently, when he talked about how Midnight Cowboy makes him sad. There are some things, in fact, that you can't go back to because to go back is to ruin it.* In his entry he gives a specific example of something that could only be ruined by looking back:

But here’s the thing: As long as I don’t see The Care Bears Movie again, the wonder I felt about it is still intact, and I don’t want to screw that up, you know? Why clutter the memory with an adult perspective that grasps what a crappy movie it is?

And that's the question, right? If you have something wonderful about your past or your childhood, why go back to it? Sometimes, of course, going back is inevitable -- I can't stop people from friending me on Facebook**-- but sometimes, particularly in the case of cultural artifacts, like Mark's Care Bears Movie, it's not, and we might be better served by sticking to memory, which leaves us with something to love, and gives us something to imagine.

~~~

* The clearest example of this I can think of in my own life is my experience of Garrison Keillor's A Prairie Home Companion. One evening in the late spring, I happened to catch an episode of PHC on NPR. In it, Keillor did a monologue about Lake Woebegone (as he usually does) and talked about the kids graduating from high school, standing in their gowns, the graduation ceremony, the parents in their driveways taking photos...and it was so...perfect, so amazing, that I have never listened to another episode of the show again. Ever. No kidding. I haven't even tried to find out which episode of the show I heard, because if it heard it again, I might notice a mistake, a flaw, and my perfect memory would be ruined.

** Nor do I really want to, unless you were a jerk to me, in which case, why would you even think to friend me? Are you high?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Monday Miscellany

1. I've been watching old episodes of The West Wing on Bravo lately, and have come to the conclusion that I love the character of Sam Seaborn. He's smart, he's earnest, he's a good writer, and he's played by Rob Lowe. What's not to love?* 2. I just bought the cutest jacket at Ann Taylor Loft. I know you care, but it's not every day that one can find a white denim jacket with styling reminiscent of Michael Jackson and a tailored waist. I'm just saying. 3. NaNoWriMo proceeds apace. There is no way that I'm going to be able to keep writing at this pace after this month is over, but I'm on track to finish. It's an interesting project...in some ways the speed is freeing and in other ways it's extremely limited, as to make the word count I have no time to go back and revise. 4. Alien and Aliens are amazing movies. Alien 3 and Alien Resurrection ? Not so much. 5. This week's Glee characterization inconsistency watch: Rache...

Jay Takes A Stand

Moonrat, still at Editorial Ass, is making me think a lot lately. She did a recent post here about sexualized violence in print ads, and connected the dots to sexualized violence in books and other media, which got me thinking about how I treat girls and women in my books. To be clear--I'm a feminist. I believe in equal pay for equal work and reproductive choice, and the whole ball of wax. I'm not going to go into detail about all that here because, frankly, there are people out there whose blogs are dedicated to that kind of thing (like Jezebel *) and they do it way better than I ever could. But that's my political orientation, in case you care. So when I was writing The Book, it was very important to me that my female protagonist S did not fall into any of those "heroine needs saving by the hero" tropes that so many books for teenage girls do. Sure, there's something very "romantic" about the hero swooping in and rescuing the heroine, right? ...

The waiting is the hardest part

As I mentioned, I entered the Fangs, Fur & Fey contest over on their blog (there's a link in the sidebar). And the results are supposed to be posted on Monday, which when all the hook writers would find out whether they should send in pages or not. Cool, cool. But, as it turns out, some of the judges are really on their game, and have been turning in entries earlier. Which have been being posted earlier. Which means that for the last two days I've been checking the website obsessively in the hope of seeing my magic number - 121 - up there. Which it has NOT been. 122 has gone up, but not 121. I'm trying to take this as a good sign. ::fingers crossed:: The contest itself has been real eye-opener. Good hooks, bad hooks, good hooks for books I would never read in a million years, bad hooks for books that I think I would love ... it's really cool. I also love the comments that the judges are making, which are usually right, but which also point out just how mu...