Skip to main content

Workin' On It Wednesday #30 -- Revision is a Sweater

I'm in the midst of some major revisions on The Book at the moment, and let me tell you, there is nothing more amazing than going back through something you wrote and seeing how it all hangs together. Seriously, there are times when I'm looking at The Book and thinking to myself "I cannot believe that I, Jay, put this together!"

Of course, then you change one teeny thing and BAM! the whole structure falls apart.

Revision, my friends, is like a sweater. Pull on one thread and a whole bunch of other stuff unravels and the next thing you know a sleeve falls off and now you don't have a sweater, but an asymmetrical sweater vest, which who wants that, you know? No one, that's who.

Because this is a major revision, I'm doing it on paper. I know it's ridiculously old school of me to have printed out all 265 pages of my manuscript and be marking it up by hand, but I find it much faster than doing revisions on computer for two reasons:

1. when you're moving some big stuff around and changing order and adding in new scenes, it's actually a lot faster to have paper than it is to try to find stuff on a computer screen scrolling up and down. This morning I was trying to remember whether I'd taken out a particular scene and all I had to do was flip to the pages where it used to be and see that I'd crossed it out. If I had been working on the computer, I would have been searching for something that didn't exist any longer and driven myself mad.

2. when I finally get around to typing it in to the computer*, I have the chance to polish things up. So I'm doing a rewrite and editing at the same time. This has the added benefit of allowing me to let things go a little in the first rewrite and not being too worried about getting things perfect. I can put in more nuance and emotional depth later, when I type the stuff in.

To continue the sweater metaphor, doing the rewrite in two stages allows me to make sure I didn't drop any stitches the first time.

The beautiful thing about rewriting, even if it means you unravel a bunch of stuff that really looked good**, is that you have the chance to create whole new patterns, things that you didn't think of the first time you were knitting things together. Things that, maybe, are even better than the stuff you've gotten rid of.

~~~

* I'm pretty sure Agent Ted isn't interested in getting 265 pages full of my handwritten notes in the mail. I could be wrong about that but...no, I'm not wrong.

** And let me tell you, there were some heartbreaking moments where I had to lose a piece of dialogue or a scene I really liked. All fodder for the "extras" post when The Book actually gets published is what I tell myself. WHILE I WEEP.

Comments

Donna Gambale said…
Is it bad that I'm singing Weezer right now? "If you want to destroy my sweaterrrrrrr..."

But great post. :)
Anonymous said…
So, your book still has witches in it, right? That sounds like a lot of rewriting!

And you thought I was insane to think about a few sentences for a few years! Well, when I get them down, they stay down, ha ha. (Then again, I don't have anybody telling me to change it. I have that going for me, too.)

Can't wait to read it and see how things have changed.

This post's word verification: CLETAL. I'm not even going to make a joke about this. It writes itself. Cletal.
Jay Montville said…
Hee, Donna! The same thing happened to me--I spent all morning humming that song--I finally had tp play it on my iPod to get it out of my head.
Jay Montville said…
@ Anonymous -- heh. I'll email you about your actual questions, but CLETAL? That's a great word. The defininitions are myriad...

Popular posts from this blog

Monday Miscellany

1. I've been watching old episodes of The West Wing on Bravo lately, and have come to the conclusion that I love the character of Sam Seaborn. He's smart, he's earnest, he's a good writer, and he's played by Rob Lowe. What's not to love?* 2. I just bought the cutest jacket at Ann Taylor Loft. I know you care, but it's not every day that one can find a white denim jacket with styling reminiscent of Michael Jackson and a tailored waist. I'm just saying. 3. NaNoWriMo proceeds apace. There is no way that I'm going to be able to keep writing at this pace after this month is over, but I'm on track to finish. It's an interesting project...in some ways the speed is freeing and in other ways it's extremely limited, as to make the word count I have no time to go back and revise. 4. Alien and Aliens are amazing movies. Alien 3 and Alien Resurrection ? Not so much. 5. This week's Glee characterization inconsistency watch: Rache...

Why Are The Characters Friends?

Lately, I've been reading a lot of books where the main character and her best friend don't get along. This is confusing to me. Why is the main character friends with someone she dislikes, or is afraid of, or actually hates? I get that it happens--I've seen Mean Girls . I've read Queen Bees and Wannabes . Heck, I'm old enough to have been the prime audience for Heathers . But in order for this fractured best friend relationship to be convincing, it has to be set up. In both Heathers and Mean Girls , there's a reason why the protagonist is friends with a bunch of b*tches--she chose to be. She knows that they're jerks. In fact, she can feel herself becoming a jerk right along with them. It's part of the character arc, the point of the story, that being friends with these girls is not who she really is. But the relationships I've been seeing lately don't make that kind of sense. The protagonist doesn't have a reason to be friends with...

Jay Takes A Stand

Moonrat, still at Editorial Ass, is making me think a lot lately. She did a recent post here about sexualized violence in print ads, and connected the dots to sexualized violence in books and other media, which got me thinking about how I treat girls and women in my books. To be clear--I'm a feminist. I believe in equal pay for equal work and reproductive choice, and the whole ball of wax. I'm not going to go into detail about all that here because, frankly, there are people out there whose blogs are dedicated to that kind of thing (like Jezebel *) and they do it way better than I ever could. But that's my political orientation, in case you care. So when I was writing The Book, it was very important to me that my female protagonist S did not fall into any of those "heroine needs saving by the hero" tropes that so many books for teenage girls do. Sure, there's something very "romantic" about the hero swooping in and rescuing the heroine, right? ...