Skip to main content

Workin' On It Wednesday #23 - Villains Are People, Too

Earlier this month, Lynn Viehl had a lovely post about antagonists called, hilariously, "Ten Things I Hate About Your Protagonist." In that post, she talks about the number of ways that antagonists can be two-dimensional or just plain boring. My favorite of hers?

In the middle of the final crisis in the story, when she has the upper hand over everyone, the antagonist proudly delivers a full confession of all the wrong she's done.

Hmmmm. Maybe she's Catholic.

In the world of The Incredibles, this flaw would be called "monologuing." :) Seriously, though, this should never happen anymore. Not even in James Bond.*

My own personal problem in writing antagonists is that I don't spend enough time on them. My villains aren't two-dimensional, exactly, but I don't have a good idea what's going on with them in the early drafts. Like, they just show up for plot purposes and I don't know enough about their internal lives to know why they would show up in this particular place at this particular time. And then one of the members of my critique group will be like "was he just hanging out in the bathroom waiting for your main character to show up or what?" and I'll slap my forehead and figure out why the hell my villain was there in the first place.

The thing is, I don't know why this is something I have to be told every time. I should know this, already. I do know this already. I even wrote about it before: every character is the protagonist of his own story. Now I just need to remember it.

~~~

* One of my MANY problems with the latest Terminator movie was the monologuing that happened at the very end. To make matters worse, it was SKYNET (the computer that takes over the world) who did the monologuing! The only acceptable excuse for monologuing is the antagonist's desire to gloat over the hero, which as a computer SkyNet doesn't antually have. sigh. And that's not even close to my biggest problem with that film. Note to Self: Christian Bale can't save everything, Jay, a lesson you should have learned from Reign of Fire.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Monday Miscellany

1. I've been watching old episodes of The West Wing on Bravo lately, and have come to the conclusion that I love the character of Sam Seaborn. He's smart, he's earnest, he's a good writer, and he's played by Rob Lowe. What's not to love?* 2. I just bought the cutest jacket at Ann Taylor Loft. I know you care, but it's not every day that one can find a white denim jacket with styling reminiscent of Michael Jackson and a tailored waist. I'm just saying. 3. NaNoWriMo proceeds apace. There is no way that I'm going to be able to keep writing at this pace after this month is over, but I'm on track to finish. It's an interesting project...in some ways the speed is freeing and in other ways it's extremely limited, as to make the word count I have no time to go back and revise. 4. Alien and Aliens are amazing movies. Alien 3 and Alien Resurrection ? Not so much. 5. This week's Glee characterization inconsistency watch: Rache...

Jay Takes A Stand

Moonrat, still at Editorial Ass, is making me think a lot lately. She did a recent post here about sexualized violence in print ads, and connected the dots to sexualized violence in books and other media, which got me thinking about how I treat girls and women in my books. To be clear--I'm a feminist. I believe in equal pay for equal work and reproductive choice, and the whole ball of wax. I'm not going to go into detail about all that here because, frankly, there are people out there whose blogs are dedicated to that kind of thing (like Jezebel *) and they do it way better than I ever could. But that's my political orientation, in case you care. So when I was writing The Book, it was very important to me that my female protagonist S did not fall into any of those "heroine needs saving by the hero" tropes that so many books for teenage girls do. Sure, there's something very "romantic" about the hero swooping in and rescuing the heroine, right? ...

The waiting is the hardest part

As I mentioned, I entered the Fangs, Fur & Fey contest over on their blog (there's a link in the sidebar). And the results are supposed to be posted on Monday, which when all the hook writers would find out whether they should send in pages or not. Cool, cool. But, as it turns out, some of the judges are really on their game, and have been turning in entries earlier. Which have been being posted earlier. Which means that for the last two days I've been checking the website obsessively in the hope of seeing my magic number - 121 - up there. Which it has NOT been. 122 has gone up, but not 121. I'm trying to take this as a good sign. ::fingers crossed:: The contest itself has been real eye-opener. Good hooks, bad hooks, good hooks for books I would never read in a million years, bad hooks for books that I think I would love ... it's really cool. I also love the comments that the judges are making, which are usually right, but which also point out just how mu...