Skip to main content

Monday Miscellany

1. Public Enemies is not a good movie. I know. I was all hyped about it myself, because PotC 2 & 3* notwithstanding, I usually find Johnny Depp interesting to watch. Plus, Christian Bale, who I will watch in any piece of crap he chooses to take on (including, yes, Reign of Fire and Equilibrium). Plus the story of John Dillinger, who had a pretty exciting life. But, despite all of this, Public Enemies was boring. BORING. There was no plot to speak of, ninety nine percent of the characters had no motivation (when you could even tell who was who, that was)**, and there were a bunch of famous or semi-famous actors in the movie (Lili Taylor, Billy Crudup, LeeLee Sobieski, Stephen Dorff, Giovanni Ribisi, David Wenham***, and bunch of people from television shows) whose casting was really more of a distraction than anything, since none of them actually had any parts. Michael Mann tends to use stunt casting like this to distinguish the characters in the movie, which is distracting. So instead of understanding that John Dillinger is having a conversation with Alvin Karpis, a major criminal who committed kidnappings and even a train robbery, the audience thinks "oh, there's Johnny Depp having a conversation with Giovanni Ribisi" but doesn't understand why that conversation matters.

Okay, sorry. The movie was a big disappointment is what I'm saying.

2. Not a big disappointment? My viewing, in a theater, of American Psycho. I've seen it before, of course****, a number of times, but I only saw it in the theater once, and it was well worth it to watch it on the big screen again. People made a big deal about it when it came out, about the film's treatment of women and all that*****, but the film's treatment of men in general and Patrick Bateman in particular isn't anything to be proud of. I think it's more remarkable for the atypical exploitation of the male form. Usually women are the ones on display, but in American Psycho it's all Christian Bale.

3. Yard work? Still not fun.

4. My next door neighbors installed a basketball hoop for their kids right outside the window of my office. They'd better get tired of it really quickly or I'm going to be very upset.



~~~

* Pirates of the Caribbean 2 & 3. PotC 2 has the honor of being one of the few movies I've ever walked out of the theater on. Why? Because it was BORING. At one point, my friend leaned over to me and said "there's two more hours of this to go" and I said "Oh, I'm outta here."

** This is a common problem in Michael Mann movies for me. I spent the first hour of Heat trying to figure out if Robert DeNiro or Al Pacino was supposed to be the cop. And I still don't know their character's names.

*** Who is probably only famous to you if you watched the Lord of the Rings Trilogy--he was Faramir--but still, a lot of people watched that.

**** See above for my total dedication to all things Christian Bale.

***** Which is totally valid--women, in the world of American Psycho, are for the most part pretty stupid and useless creatures.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Not that I was going to see it but at least you saved me the trouble of even wondering about it. It just didn't look like a good movie to me. The ads were all "hey, it's Johnny Depp playing a gangster!" and that was about it. A shame because Mann actually makes a good movie every now and then (The Insider, terrific movie).

I've never walked out on a movie but then I only go to the theaters about once a year. Honestly. I rent movies but don't feel I'm getting screwed that much if a rental turns out to be average or boring. Any more, I want movies that challenge me, hence my fascination with David Lynch. Say what you will, his stuff is WEIRD and affects you on a very strange level. Some of it is complete junk, of course, but every now and then, he'll have a scene that just hits home in some odd way.

I've seen pieces of American Psycho and I read the book. I'm not a fan. I don't dislike it; I really don't feel one way or the other about it. I've seen better, I've seen worse. I've read better, I've read worse.

What's YOUR favorite movie of all time?
Jay Montville said…
I don't have a favorite movie. It's not possible for me, just like it's not possible for me to pick a favorite book. On any given day, my mood could dictate that I pick something frivolous or totally serious and challenging. I could do a list, but it would be a long list. :)
Anonymous said…
I understand it's difficult. No need for a long list. Why not just toss off five or so movies that you recall really enjoying? They don't have to be serious. I have enjoyed some pretty stupid movies in my day!

Popular posts from this blog

Monday Miscellany

1. I've been watching old episodes of The West Wing on Bravo lately, and have come to the conclusion that I love the character of Sam Seaborn. He's smart, he's earnest, he's a good writer, and he's played by Rob Lowe. What's not to love?* 2. I just bought the cutest jacket at Ann Taylor Loft. I know you care, but it's not every day that one can find a white denim jacket with styling reminiscent of Michael Jackson and a tailored waist. I'm just saying. 3. NaNoWriMo proceeds apace. There is no way that I'm going to be able to keep writing at this pace after this month is over, but I'm on track to finish. It's an interesting project...in some ways the speed is freeing and in other ways it's extremely limited, as to make the word count I have no time to go back and revise. 4. Alien and Aliens are amazing movies. Alien 3 and Alien Resurrection ? Not so much. 5. This week's Glee characterization inconsistency watch: Rache...

Why Are The Characters Friends?

Lately, I've been reading a lot of books where the main character and her best friend don't get along. This is confusing to me. Why is the main character friends with someone she dislikes, or is afraid of, or actually hates? I get that it happens--I've seen Mean Girls . I've read Queen Bees and Wannabes . Heck, I'm old enough to have been the prime audience for Heathers . But in order for this fractured best friend relationship to be convincing, it has to be set up. In both Heathers and Mean Girls , there's a reason why the protagonist is friends with a bunch of b*tches--she chose to be. She knows that they're jerks. In fact, she can feel herself becoming a jerk right along with them. It's part of the character arc, the point of the story, that being friends with these girls is not who she really is. But the relationships I've been seeing lately don't make that kind of sense. The protagonist doesn't have a reason to be friends with...

Jay Takes A Stand

Moonrat, still at Editorial Ass, is making me think a lot lately. She did a recent post here about sexualized violence in print ads, and connected the dots to sexualized violence in books and other media, which got me thinking about how I treat girls and women in my books. To be clear--I'm a feminist. I believe in equal pay for equal work and reproductive choice, and the whole ball of wax. I'm not going to go into detail about all that here because, frankly, there are people out there whose blogs are dedicated to that kind of thing (like Jezebel *) and they do it way better than I ever could. But that's my political orientation, in case you care. So when I was writing The Book, it was very important to me that my female protagonist S did not fall into any of those "heroine needs saving by the hero" tropes that so many books for teenage girls do. Sure, there's something very "romantic" about the hero swooping in and rescuing the heroine, right? ...