Skip to main content

Workin' On It Wednesday #22 - On Market Awareness

Over on his blog, Nathan Bransford has done an interview with YA legend S.E. Hinton*, in which she talks about her writing and where her stories come from. It's a good interview, but the part that really caught my eye was her response when Nathan asked her about advice for new writers. She said this:

Write for yourself first. Don't study the market, it will change before you can get a book done. The writing is the thing to concentrate on. If you don't want to read it, nobody will.

God, truer words, right? I mean, the market is something that can't be controlled, and, as several people have pointed out on several blogs (it comes up over and over again, so I'm not going to link to it), writing what's "hot" right now is a waste of time because by the time you get your book out there, the "hot" has turned "cold" and something else is hot. Chasing trends is as pointless as chasing your shadow, and not nearly as much fun.**

I guess for me it's a fine line--I don't follow trends closely (I don't have the time) and I write what I want to read.*** But at the same time, I'm not one of those "books are my babies" people who can't change anything about what they write because of the "integrity of the creative process" or whatever. I'm fortunate in that I can fall in love with a lot of different ideas and write them with equal devotion, which makes me flexible. But I'm not so flexible that I will bend over backwards to write to the market. I couldn't, even if it were profitable or useful to do so.

I suppose the point of this whole post is that it's important to have a realistic view of the market and your marketability (if that's what you're going for), but it's even more important to have a love for your story.

~~~

* Seriously, she's a legend. If you're too cool for The Outsiders or Rumblefish, then you're too cool for me.

** There's also the corollary to that, which is nothing is a trend until the market makes it so. Books about wizards were not a "trend" when Rowling wrote Harry Potter. Vampires were not a "trend" when Stephenie Meyer sold Twilight. Trends happen after not before books.

*** That's why I write YA, by the way. I enjoy it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Monday Miscellany

1. I've been watching old episodes of The West Wing on Bravo lately, and have come to the conclusion that I love the character of Sam Seaborn. He's smart, he's earnest, he's a good writer, and he's played by Rob Lowe. What's not to love?* 2. I just bought the cutest jacket at Ann Taylor Loft. I know you care, but it's not every day that one can find a white denim jacket with styling reminiscent of Michael Jackson and a tailored waist. I'm just saying. 3. NaNoWriMo proceeds apace. There is no way that I'm going to be able to keep writing at this pace after this month is over, but I'm on track to finish. It's an interesting project...in some ways the speed is freeing and in other ways it's extremely limited, as to make the word count I have no time to go back and revise. 4. Alien and Aliens are amazing movies. Alien 3 and Alien Resurrection ? Not so much. 5. This week's Glee characterization inconsistency watch: Rache...

Why Are The Characters Friends?

Lately, I've been reading a lot of books where the main character and her best friend don't get along. This is confusing to me. Why is the main character friends with someone she dislikes, or is afraid of, or actually hates? I get that it happens--I've seen Mean Girls . I've read Queen Bees and Wannabes . Heck, I'm old enough to have been the prime audience for Heathers . But in order for this fractured best friend relationship to be convincing, it has to be set up. In both Heathers and Mean Girls , there's a reason why the protagonist is friends with a bunch of b*tches--she chose to be. She knows that they're jerks. In fact, she can feel herself becoming a jerk right along with them. It's part of the character arc, the point of the story, that being friends with these girls is not who she really is. But the relationships I've been seeing lately don't make that kind of sense. The protagonist doesn't have a reason to be friends with...

Jay Takes A Stand

Moonrat, still at Editorial Ass, is making me think a lot lately. She did a recent post here about sexualized violence in print ads, and connected the dots to sexualized violence in books and other media, which got me thinking about how I treat girls and women in my books. To be clear--I'm a feminist. I believe in equal pay for equal work and reproductive choice, and the whole ball of wax. I'm not going to go into detail about all that here because, frankly, there are people out there whose blogs are dedicated to that kind of thing (like Jezebel *) and they do it way better than I ever could. But that's my political orientation, in case you care. So when I was writing The Book, it was very important to me that my female protagonist S did not fall into any of those "heroine needs saving by the hero" tropes that so many books for teenage girls do. Sure, there's something very "romantic" about the hero swooping in and rescuing the heroine, right? ...