Skip to main content

Jay Has A Rule #2 - Be Professional

Over at Bookends, LLC, Jessica has a post in which she responds to a question about how she matches writers to editors. The questioner asks whether she thinks about the personalities in play and she says, in part:
I debated saying this, but I’m not sure it’s my job to judge who a client can get along with. This is a business, not a dating service. Ideally I would like to find an editor who is perfect, who can please my author in every way and who my client can get along with beautifully, but editors are people too, and frankly, I don’t always know how an editor is going to act or treat a client until we’re in the midst of a relationship.
I was surprised that this would be an issue. It never occurred to me that people would be worried about whether they would get along with their editors or not. Of course, like every writer, I anticipate that there can be issues between the editor and writer, where the editor wants changes and the writer doesn't want them, or the writer wants this cover but the editor thinks that on will be more effective. But it didn't occur to me that people would be worried about personality issues.

Perhaps that's because I work in an environment of conflict everyday. I don't mean that in a bad way--my company is a very nice place to work and the people there are pretty easy to get along with. But conflict is inherent in the legal profession; it's just naturally part of what we do, even when everyone involved is perfectly polite. Also, the role of Legal in a corporation is to put the brakes on things that the business people want to do, so I spend a lot of time explaining to business people why their latest and greatest idea really should be done in a different way, or shouldn't be done at all. Conflict!

I guess what I'm saying is that, in a professional context, I'm used to people wanting things from me that they aren't going to get, and I'm used to wanting things from others that I'm not going to get, and I can have those discussions without getting upset about them.* So it didn't occur to me that I should be worried about my relationship with my editor.** And it certainly didn't occur to me that Agent Ted would be choosing who to submit the book to based on personality fit. Why would he?

I think that some people have the idea that a writer and her agent and editor should be friends. I do not think that. I think that, sometimes, agents and writers (or editors and writers) do become friends, but that that's pure happenstance, not a prerequisite. Like, at work, there are some people who are perfectly cool, fun, pleasant people who are not my friends. They are my co-workers. We work together and get along and chat and laugh, but it's just a way to socially lubricate getting the work done.*** Then there are a few people whose interests and opinions line up with mine so well that there's no way we couldn't become friends once we met.

That's how I see my relationship with an agent or editor--we start by being social and friendly, in an effort to obtain the mutually desirable result of World Domination...but we aren't friends. Of course, we'll be working closely together, so personality does matter, to some extent,**** but it's not something I would expect to be a large factor. I'm a professional (or, I really really want to be one...come on 2009!), and I'll behave as one. If I become friends with the people I work with, that's like icing on a really delicious cupcake.

~~~

*Most of the time. MOST of the time.

**Assuming I get one.

***I don't mean in a Machiavellian manipulative sense--I'm not orchestrating jokes with my business people to get them to do what I want or whatever--it's just people being social and friendly to make the workday pass.

****We've all heard those horror stories of writers being so difficult that others don't want to work with them. In fact, Mysterious admits here that he passed on a project he otherwise liked because he didn't want to work with the writer involved.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Monday Miscellany

1. I've been watching old episodes of The West Wing on Bravo lately, and have come to the conclusion that I love the character of Sam Seaborn. He's smart, he's earnest, he's a good writer, and he's played by Rob Lowe. What's not to love?* 2. I just bought the cutest jacket at Ann Taylor Loft. I know you care, but it's not every day that one can find a white denim jacket with styling reminiscent of Michael Jackson and a tailored waist. I'm just saying. 3. NaNoWriMo proceeds apace. There is no way that I'm going to be able to keep writing at this pace after this month is over, but I'm on track to finish. It's an interesting project...in some ways the speed is freeing and in other ways it's extremely limited, as to make the word count I have no time to go back and revise. 4. Alien and Aliens are amazing movies. Alien 3 and Alien Resurrection ? Not so much. 5. This week's Glee characterization inconsistency watch: Rache...

Jay Takes A Stand

Moonrat, still at Editorial Ass, is making me think a lot lately. She did a recent post here about sexualized violence in print ads, and connected the dots to sexualized violence in books and other media, which got me thinking about how I treat girls and women in my books. To be clear--I'm a feminist. I believe in equal pay for equal work and reproductive choice, and the whole ball of wax. I'm not going to go into detail about all that here because, frankly, there are people out there whose blogs are dedicated to that kind of thing (like Jezebel *) and they do it way better than I ever could. But that's my political orientation, in case you care. So when I was writing The Book, it was very important to me that my female protagonist S did not fall into any of those "heroine needs saving by the hero" tropes that so many books for teenage girls do. Sure, there's something very "romantic" about the hero swooping in and rescuing the heroine, right? ...

The waiting is the hardest part

As I mentioned, I entered the Fangs, Fur & Fey contest over on their blog (there's a link in the sidebar). And the results are supposed to be posted on Monday, which when all the hook writers would find out whether they should send in pages or not. Cool, cool. But, as it turns out, some of the judges are really on their game, and have been turning in entries earlier. Which have been being posted earlier. Which means that for the last two days I've been checking the website obsessively in the hope of seeing my magic number - 121 - up there. Which it has NOT been. 122 has gone up, but not 121. I'm trying to take this as a good sign. ::fingers crossed:: The contest itself has been real eye-opener. Good hooks, bad hooks, good hooks for books I would never read in a million years, bad hooks for books that I think I would love ... it's really cool. I also love the comments that the judges are making, which are usually right, but which also point out just how mu...