Skip to main content

Jay cuts a scene

One of the things I like about the internet is that it allows authors to show people things that never made it into the final drafts of books. A lot of times, there are good reasons for not including these scenes (like, they suck?), but it's interesting to see them nonetheless. It's like the extras on a DVD - you can look at those extras without polluting the author's final version of the text.

In the book that I'm working on now, there are a LOT of those extras. This book has gone through several incarnations over the years. There was a version in which there were four sections, each of which was told from the point of view of another character. It was a disaster. Interesting (at least to me), but seriously a disaster from a book perspective.

Also, when I started writing, I wrote a lot of scenes that I wanted to see that didn't actually fit in anywhere once the plot finally crystalized. That blows, because I really like a lot of those scenes. They're cute. They're funny. They have good banter. They're sexy. At least some of them are those things. To me. :) But they don't work, so they gotta go, and any relevant character revelations that happen in them have to be moved into other scenes. It's for the best, of course - it makes the remaining scenes stronger and gives them more depth - but I really liked that scene where my main character S goes to a track meet! It didn't do anything, once I took a second look at it, but it was charming and let me put one of my guy characters in those short track shorts, which was fun.

Even in the latest incarnation of the book, I've had to get rid of a couple of scenes that I really liked. It's because of the way I write - I just go where the idea takes me and see what happens, so I go down a number of false paths and have to back up to the crossroads and start over. I don't mind; it's just a fact of my writing life.

The challenging part, though, is how to recognize when I'm falling in love with a scene because it's something I wanted to see or because it's cleverly done, and when to recognize that I'm falling in love with a scene because it's doing what it's supposed to be doing (and is cleverly done, of course :) ). Typically, my extraneous scenes involve very little action - that's the twig for me. If the characters are standing around talking about something that's not plot-related, I'm wasting time. Not that the character development shouldn't be shown somewhere else, but it needs to be done in conjunction with forward movement, not separately from it. Assuming I get published (a big assumption, I know, but it's my party and I'll dream if I want to), I'm totally going to do up a website with a whole bunch of scenes and early versions that never made it into the actual book, just in case people are interested.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Monday Miscellany

1. I've been watching old episodes of The West Wing on Bravo lately, and have come to the conclusion that I love the character of Sam Seaborn. He's smart, he's earnest, he's a good writer, and he's played by Rob Lowe. What's not to love?* 2. I just bought the cutest jacket at Ann Taylor Loft. I know you care, but it's not every day that one can find a white denim jacket with styling reminiscent of Michael Jackson and a tailored waist. I'm just saying. 3. NaNoWriMo proceeds apace. There is no way that I'm going to be able to keep writing at this pace after this month is over, but I'm on track to finish. It's an interesting project...in some ways the speed is freeing and in other ways it's extremely limited, as to make the word count I have no time to go back and revise. 4. Alien and Aliens are amazing movies. Alien 3 and Alien Resurrection ? Not so much. 5. This week's Glee characterization inconsistency watch: Rache...

Jay Takes A Stand

Moonrat, still at Editorial Ass, is making me think a lot lately. She did a recent post here about sexualized violence in print ads, and connected the dots to sexualized violence in books and other media, which got me thinking about how I treat girls and women in my books. To be clear--I'm a feminist. I believe in equal pay for equal work and reproductive choice, and the whole ball of wax. I'm not going to go into detail about all that here because, frankly, there are people out there whose blogs are dedicated to that kind of thing (like Jezebel *) and they do it way better than I ever could. But that's my political orientation, in case you care. So when I was writing The Book, it was very important to me that my female protagonist S did not fall into any of those "heroine needs saving by the hero" tropes that so many books for teenage girls do. Sure, there's something very "romantic" about the hero swooping in and rescuing the heroine, right? ...

The waiting is the hardest part

As I mentioned, I entered the Fangs, Fur & Fey contest over on their blog (there's a link in the sidebar). And the results are supposed to be posted on Monday, which when all the hook writers would find out whether they should send in pages or not. Cool, cool. But, as it turns out, some of the judges are really on their game, and have been turning in entries earlier. Which have been being posted earlier. Which means that for the last two days I've been checking the website obsessively in the hope of seeing my magic number - 121 - up there. Which it has NOT been. 122 has gone up, but not 121. I'm trying to take this as a good sign. ::fingers crossed:: The contest itself has been real eye-opener. Good hooks, bad hooks, good hooks for books I would never read in a million years, bad hooks for books that I think I would love ... it's really cool. I also love the comments that the judges are making, which are usually right, but which also point out just how mu...