Skip to main content

Workin' On It Wednesday #9 -- Overwriting

The divine Miss Moonrat has a post here describing the plight of the Overwriter. You know this person--the one who never uses "red" when he can use "crimson," the one whose never met an adverb that she didn't love, the one whose dialogue doesn't sound like anything you've ever heard anybody say, ever, and that includes in historical romances.

The whole post is well worth reading, but my favorite part, and the one I am most merciless on myself about, is the part about dialogue tags. This is what Moonrat has to say:

It's ok to use the word "said," even if you use it more than once. Really. You can just say "Jackie said" instead of "Jackie sneered jeeringly" or "Jackie continued her bombastic harangue, her outraged grimace flickering as a sympathetic smirk fought its way to the surface." Repeat after me: WORDS SPEAK LOUDER THAN DIALOGUE TAGS.
heh. As Omar would say "indeed."* I almost always use "said" as my dialogue tag, if I use a dialogue tag at all. Sometimes, if I'm feeling very adventurous, I will use "asked" or "___ told ___" (as in "she told me" or "I told her"). I almost never use anything else.**

"But Jay," you may be saying, "that sounds sooo boring. Said, said, SAID, all the way home!" To which I respond, no, actually, it's not boring at all. Why?

Because "said" is invisible. Readers don't see it. It's the word equivalent of a comma--they don't even notice it's there. Take a look at this excerpt of dialogue from something I'm working on right now:

Angela shuddered. "They're so creepy," she said. "And they're always around, staring at you."
"Um, okay," I said. "Thanks for the heads up, I guess."
"It's not just them," Angela said. "It's him."
I sat up. Angela had just become a lot more interesting. "What about him?"
The "saids" in those five lines (and there are three of them) hardly even register. They're essentially places where the character would take a breath or pause. Now look at it with some overwritten dialogue tags:

Angela shuddered. "They're so creepy," she murmured conspiratorially. "And they're always around, staring at you."
"Um, okay," I said dismissively. "Thanks for the heads up, I guess."
"It's not just them," Angela exclaimed. "It's him."
I sat up. Angela had just become a lot more interesting. "What about him?" I queried.
Yeah, exactly. "Said" doesn't show up in the reader's mind, but those other words, especially the adverbs, do. And eventually the reader is going to get tired of those words. But you know what word the reader's never going to get tired of?

SAID.

Learn it, love it, USE IT.

P.S. I also love the list of "overwriter words" that Moonrat has in this post. I have to admit that I checked for all of those words in the stuff I'm currently revising and was relieved when I didn't find any of them except "suddenly." sigh. "Suddenly" is my weakness. Fortunately, I only use it when things are actually happening suddenly, so I'm going to grant myself a dispensation on that one.
~~~

* Omar Little is from The Wire. He's a philosopher-king, that one. He's mythical.

** While I was editing the book, I noticed that one of my more dramatic characters got some very (f0r me) flamboyant dialogue tags--"hummed," "drawled," "purred." I know! I felt it was okay for this character to have a few of these because he was soooo dramatic, but I made sure that I considered each one carefully, and ended up taking out quite a few.

Comments

Katie Alender said…
My overwriting style is to say, "I saw her walk down the hallway," instead of, "She walked down the hallway." That kind of thing.

And (okay, this is slightly off topic) I hate the word "chuckle", unless it's applied to a very old man. Young people do not chuckle. It gives me the heeby-jeebies just thinking about it.
Jay Montville said…
Oh, I do that all the time, too. My characters are always "seeing" or "watching" or "feeling" someone do something. Which is fine every once in a while, but every sentence? No, Jay. Just...no.

I don't hate the word "chuckle" but, until you pointed it out, I have to say that I don't think I ever used it with a young character. *runs off to check, because Katie is right...eww.*

Popular posts from this blog

Monday Miscellany

1. I've been watching old episodes of The West Wing on Bravo lately, and have come to the conclusion that I love the character of Sam Seaborn. He's smart, he's earnest, he's a good writer, and he's played by Rob Lowe. What's not to love?* 2. I just bought the cutest jacket at Ann Taylor Loft. I know you care, but it's not every day that one can find a white denim jacket with styling reminiscent of Michael Jackson and a tailored waist. I'm just saying. 3. NaNoWriMo proceeds apace. There is no way that I'm going to be able to keep writing at this pace after this month is over, but I'm on track to finish. It's an interesting project...in some ways the speed is freeing and in other ways it's extremely limited, as to make the word count I have no time to go back and revise. 4. Alien and Aliens are amazing movies. Alien 3 and Alien Resurrection ? Not so much. 5. This week's Glee characterization inconsistency watch: Rache...

Jay Takes A Stand

Moonrat, still at Editorial Ass, is making me think a lot lately. She did a recent post here about sexualized violence in print ads, and connected the dots to sexualized violence in books and other media, which got me thinking about how I treat girls and women in my books. To be clear--I'm a feminist. I believe in equal pay for equal work and reproductive choice, and the whole ball of wax. I'm not going to go into detail about all that here because, frankly, there are people out there whose blogs are dedicated to that kind of thing (like Jezebel *) and they do it way better than I ever could. But that's my political orientation, in case you care. So when I was writing The Book, it was very important to me that my female protagonist S did not fall into any of those "heroine needs saving by the hero" tropes that so many books for teenage girls do. Sure, there's something very "romantic" about the hero swooping in and rescuing the heroine, right? ...

The waiting is the hardest part

As I mentioned, I entered the Fangs, Fur & Fey contest over on their blog (there's a link in the sidebar). And the results are supposed to be posted on Monday, which when all the hook writers would find out whether they should send in pages or not. Cool, cool. But, as it turns out, some of the judges are really on their game, and have been turning in entries earlier. Which have been being posted earlier. Which means that for the last two days I've been checking the website obsessively in the hope of seeing my magic number - 121 - up there. Which it has NOT been. 122 has gone up, but not 121. I'm trying to take this as a good sign. ::fingers crossed:: The contest itself has been real eye-opener. Good hooks, bad hooks, good hooks for books I would never read in a million years, bad hooks for books that I think I would love ... it's really cool. I also love the comments that the judges are making, which are usually right, but which also point out just how mu...